GMWA 38 – Envelopegate at the Oscars; Small Group Bible Studies, Homebirthing, Robert Frost, Eschatology

Good Morning White America! In this episode Adam and Mary break down the Oscars Best Picture fiasco, and they also give details about the upcoming small group Bible studies due to begin Sunday, March 5.  Hans and Anna Gygax get more into the details of homebirthing,  the Hate Bird introduces us to Robert Frost, and Blake K. surveys the eschatology of dispensational premillennialism.

Thanks for listening! Please subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, and share it with everyone you know!

46:21 – Biblical Nationalist Principles in Every Decision, with Hans & Anna Gygax

59:17 – Thoughts for the Eighth Day, with Blake K.

1:06:09 – Real Poetry Hours, with the Hate Bird

1:09:36 – Funny stuff with Adam and Mary

Find podcasts, books, fellowship, and articles at!

Subscribe on iTunes at:…ast/id1124195733

Follow us on Twitter and @GMWhiteAmerica

Find us on Facebook at

Download new episodes at or on Soundcloud at

Read Adam Grey’s articles at

Link: Watch the entire Oscar Best Picture fiasco

Link: Pulse Point

Link: Hover bike

Link: Honest Abe

Link: Just another Monday

Link: And a really bad week….

Essential Christianity, Vol. 1: Genesis

This is our study guide for our 10-week study of Genesis. It’s available in paperback from or via download as a free PDF.

Our study of Genesis is broken into 10 sessions. Each session has questions for further reflection and study, and the study guide has several pages for taking notes.

Table of Contents

1: The Word of God

2: Creation

3: Innocence

4: The Fall

5: The Flood

6: The Races of Mankind

7: The Tower of Babel

8: Abraham

9: Jacob

10: Joseph

The Bible describes the creation of the world by God, the fall of man into sin through his own disobedience, and the redemption of mankind through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. These three themes are the key to understanding the Bible and the Christian religion.

Throughout the Scriptures God is presented as the sovereign creator and governor of the universe. He has the power to kill and to make alive, the power to raise up and to cast down at His own will. He alone can make unbreakable promises. Man, on the other hand, is wicked in his fallen condition. Man is full of lies and deceit. Because of this wickedness God gives to man a law to govern his conduct and to show him his evil nature. All of Biblical history is made up of sinful man’s failure to follow God’s law. However, God was not content to allow all of mankind to perish in their sins. Instead, he gave to sinful man a redeemer, His own son Jesus Christ. Jesus suffered in our place and was made the atonement for our sins. After his ascension into Heaven Jesus sent the Holy Spirit, under whose care we are able to lead Godly lives.

GMWA 37 – The Theology of Sharing & Boundaries; Small Group Bible Studies, European Customs, Homebirthing, Rudyard Kipling, Eschatology

Good Morning White America! In this episode Adam and Mary explain what the Parable of the Ten Virgins teaches us about when we need to share and when we should not share, and they also give details about the upcoming small group Bible studies due to begin Sunday, March 5. Hans and Anna Gygax talk about homebirthing, Dr. Radl describes a very old British custom, the Hate Bird introduces us to Rudyard Kipling and reads his stirring poem “If,” and Blake K. continues his exploration of eschatology.

Thanks for listening! Please subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, and share it with everyone you know!

49:20 – Biblical Nationalist Principles in Every Decision, with Hans & Anna Gygax

58:30 – European Customs, with Dr. Karl Radl

1:00:09 – Real Poetry Hours, with the Hate Bird

1:04:39 – Thoughts for the Eighth Day, with Blake K.

1:09:58 – Funny stuff with Adam and Mary

Find podcasts, books, fellowship, and articles at!

Subscribe on iTunes at:…ast/id1124195733

Follow us on Twitter and @GMWhiteAmerica

Find us on Facebook at

Download new episodes at or on Soundcloud at

Read Adam Grey’s articles at

Link: First World charity is bad for Third World manufacturing

Link: Dancers Tell Story With Shadows

Link: Da Vinci Instrument. Looks like a piano, sounds like violins.

Da Vinci instrument design becomes reality after 550 years as …

This awesome sounding Da Vinci instrument took 550 YEARS to make. Really, no joke!

Posted by In the NOW on Sunday, February 12, 2017

Link: Firefighter Adopts Baby he delivers

Link: Trump “21 Bing” Video

21 things that President Trump says make a "bing" sound.

Posted by VICE News on Tuesday, February 7, 2017

Crypto-Jew Who Subverted the Catholic Church Turns Out to Be a Crypto-Homosexual

Gregory Baum was one of the many Jewish “converts” to Catholicism who suceeded in reversing the ancient position of the Roman Church regarding the Jews. I refer to Jews like Baum as “crypto-Jews” because they only accepted the teaching of the Catholic Church outwardly while inwardly retaining their Jewish identity. Once accepted as Catholic, these fake converts immediately sought to undermine the teachings of faith they claimed to embrace. This is a clear indication of a false conversion. In the Christian sense conversion is a complete change from one’s old way of living and thinking. It is a new birth in Jesus Christ and it marks the beginning of a life of obedience to a new set of principles. If Jews like Baum had actually converted they would have sought to follow diligently the established principles of the religion they outwardly confessed, rather than trying to tear them down.

In an article from the Jewish Daily Forward, we read about the Jewish role in making the Catholic Church more pro-Jewish:

At one critical moment in October 1964, priests Gregory Baum and Bruno Hussar joined Oesterreicher in assembling what became the final text of the council’s decree on the Jews, voted on by the bishops a year later. Like Oesterreicher, Baum and Hussar were converts of Jewish background.

They were continuing a trend going back to the First Vatican Council in 1870, when the brothers Lémann — Jews who had become Catholics and priests — presented a draft declaration on relations between the church and Jews, stating that Jews “are always very dear to God” because of their fathers and because Christ has issued from them “according to the flesh.” Without converts to Catholicism, it seems, the Catholic Church would never have “thought its way” out of the challenges of racist anti-Judaism.

What this Jewish publication is admitting is that without false conversion and infiltration the Catholic Church would have remained faithful to their traditions. The same is true of Western society at large: without Jews “helping” us along the road to secularism, multiculturalism and hedonism, we would be in a much better situation.

A recent article from Life Site News has now revealed that in addition to being a crypto-Jew, Baum was also a secret homosexual:

93-year-old Gregory Baum, a famed Canadian Catholic ex-priest, has in his latest book revealed that he secretly led an active homosexual life for decades.

Baum, who was a peritus or expert at the Second Vatican Council, reportedly composed the first draft of the conciliar document Nostra aetate, the Declaration on the Relation of the Church with Non-Christian Religions. Baum advocated for the elimination of the Church’s efforts to encourage Jews to recognize Christ as the Messiah and has since pushed social justice and liberation theology.

The influential cleric reveals candidly in The Oil Has Not Run Dry: The Story of My Theological Pathway, “I did not profess my own homosexuality in public because such an act of honesty would have reduced my influence as a critical theologian.” “I was eager to be heard as a theologian trusting in God as salvator mundi and committed to social justice, liberation theology, and global solidarity.”

Baum flatly admits that he concealed his sexual perversion in order to maintain credibility while pushing for “social justice” and globalism.

The case of Baum shows us how deadly compromise with the enemy can be. Whenever people try to “cure” the Church of homophobia, racism or antisemitism, we can be sure that that their goal is to replace Biblical teaching with thinly disguised Marxism. We should not allow non-Christian voices to tell us what the Church should be, and we should not accept converts who do not completely forsake the worldly ideologies that are seeking to destroy Christ’s kingdom.

Peace in the Lord

The Trump victory brought many of us a very new and strange experience: political victory. After so many decades of political defeat, traditionalists and nationalists had become used to being completely powerless in the face of the Jewish, globalist behemoth. Lacking outer strength, we were forced to turn inwards. While the lack of political power was certainly lamentable, there were benefits to this inward focus, especially for Christians. When we were without any help from men we had no choice but to turn to God. The constant assault of atheism, multiculturalism, feminism and militant homosexuality would bring any right-thinking man to total despair if he could not stay focused on the once and for all victory of Christ over the Devil and all of his servants. The servants of Satan might have been able to claim temporary victories for the advancement of communistic egalitarianism or the latest degenerate lifestyle, but we knew that they were living on borrowed time. The end of days will eventually come and the victory of Christ that we know by faith will be revealed to all men.

“Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” (Philippians 2:9-11)

However, now that the Trump presidency has sparked the beginning of white identity politics, our confident resignation has been replaced by something new. This something new certainly has elements of joy and relief, but, at least in my case, it also has elements of anxiety and excessive entanglement with the world. Before the Trump phenomenon my daily reading of the news brought dismay, but a calm, resigned dismay. Now as I follow the news I frequently find myself in great suspense wondering whether or not Trump will succeed. Each day I worry about what tomorrow will bring, in clear contradiction to the teaching of our Lord:

“Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.” (Matthew 6:34)

Here Jesus is not warning us against making prudent plans for the future, but against becoming so focused on the events of the world that we lose sight of God.

Following the news over the last few weeks has shown us how little power we truly have over what is happening in our country. It appears that there is a struggle going on between Trump and certain elements within our intelligence agencies. The struggle is so obscure that we cannot predict the outcome, let alone influence it. Any day now agents in the CIA might release damaging information about Trump—real or fabricated—that could lead to the end of his administration. In situations like this where we cannot control the outcome it does not benefit us at all to become consumed with anxiety. We certainly have a duty to engage in political activity and to fight for a brighter future for our people, but we cannot let this fight cause us to lose the inner peace that God has offered to us.

“Woe to them that go down to Egypt for help; and stay on horses, and trust in chariots, because they are many; and in horsemen, because they are very strong; but they look not unto the Holy One of Israel, neither seek the Lord!…Now the Egyptians are men, and not God; and their horses flesh, and not spirit. When the Lord shall stretch out his hand, both he that helpeth shall fall, and he that is holpen shall fall down, and they all shall fail together.” (Isaiah 31:1,3)

All earthly strength eventually fails. As much as we should be grateful to Trump for routing our enemies, we must not forget that ultimately his strength is earthly. Stay vigilant, and stay active in pushing the nationalist agenda in whatever way you can, but only look for peace in the one power that can never fail.

GMWA 36 – Perspective, Home Remedies, White History, Love, Eschatology

Good Morning White America! In this episode Adam flies solo and talks about keeping perspective on the things in your life, Hans and Anna Gygax talk about home remedies, Dr. Radl presents This Week in White History, the Hate Bird reads poetry for Valentine’s Day, and Blake K. begins an exploration of eschatology.

Thanks for listening! Please subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, and share it with everyone you know!

49:51 – Biblical Nationalist Principles in Every Decision, with Hans & Anna Gygax

1:09:21 – This Week in White History, with Dr. Karl Radl

1:21:39 – Real Poetry Hours, with the Hate Bird

1:23:57 – Thoughts for the Eighth Day, with Blake K.

1:28:48 – Funny stuff with Adam

Find podcasts, books, fellowship, and articles at!

Subscribe on iTunes at:…ast/id1124195733

Follow us on Twitter and @GMWhiteAmerica

Find us on Facebook at

Download new episodes at or on Soundcloud at @adamgray-577846681

Read Adam Grey’s articles at

Link: Walls and Fences children’s book by Mary Grey & illustrated by Ford Henry – full-color, 24 pages, paperback

If There Really Were a Refugee Crisis

The ongoing invasion of the West by Third World migrants is constantly being referred to as part of a “refugee crisis”. We are told that the only proper response to this crisis is to allow all migrants to settle in the West and immediately grant them full citizenship rights. Many churches have blindly accepted this narrative and are complicit in the deliberate destruction of the lands once known collectively as Christendom.

The first point to grasp is that there is no “refugee crisis.” Citing the current Syrian civil war as the cause of the “refugee crisis” is only a pretext. The anti-white elites who wish to transform the demographics of Europe actively enticed the Muslim and African hordes by promising them easy living in white countries. This is what has caused the refugee flood, not any actual catastrophe. The migrants come from all over Africa and the Middle East, not just Syria, and even the mainstream media frequently mentions that these “refugees” are fleeing from “war and poverty” in their home countries. There have always been countries in Africa and the Middle East that are poor compared to the West, and there have been wars and other conflicts in these countries for decades. If being in a country that is poorer or more violent than Western Europe grants the automatic right of immigration, then the entire third world would possess this right. When carried to its logical conclusion this attitude towards immigration can only result in the destruction of all national borders and the very concept of national sovereignty. There is nothing new in the number of non-whites who want to immigrate to the West. The “crisis” is purely the result of the fictional narrative promoted by the lying media and treasonous Western governments.

But even if there really were a refugee crisis, it does not follow that every legitimate refugee should be granted citizenship status and given a full stake in his host country. To support their pro-invasion position Evangelicals frequently site Bible verses like Leviticus 19:33, “But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.” But this verse and others like it simply cannot mean what the pro-invasion interpreters want it to mean. If the ancient Israelites had understood Leviticus 19:33 in the way that modern Christians do, the ancient nation of Israel would have disappeared within a couple generations. The ancient Israelites would have invited every neighboring worshiper of Molech or Beelzebub to live in their country, vote in their assemblies, and be granted landed property, all without making any demands that the newcomers adopt the native religion or culture of Israel. This is not what God commanded His people to do. The Israelites were to chose their political rulers from their own kinsmen, and they were to carefully preserve the tribal allotment of land ownership. The Old Testament is quite clear that Israel was to remain a religiously, culturally and ethnically distinct nation. It is impossible that God’s law could include any commandments that would lead to the destruction of the nation Israel, or to the nation-state in general. Leviticus 19:33 simply means that strangers must be treated equally before the law. God told His people that it was unlawful to abuse or defraud non-citizens, but He did not tell them that the distinction between citizen and non-citizen must be completely abolished. Contemporary pro-invasion Christians have adopted the globalist position that the very concepts of national sovereignty and distinct citizenship are sinful. This is a perversion of Biblical teaching and it will bring about the destruction of our independent nations.

If there really were innocent people who needed shelter in our lands, this could be done on a temporary basis and without allowing potentially dangerous refugees to move freely throughout our society. We could make it clear that refugees that are racially or ideologically incompatible with our nation will not be allowed to become citizens. We could invite them into our own countries and provide safe, segregated accommodations until the situation in their homelands improved. If the refugees found such accommodations insulting and decided to return home rather than put up with such “racism”, then clearly their lives were not in danger in the first place.

When the lying media talks about the “refugee crisis” their primary goal is not saving the lives of those threatened by war. Their goal is to facilitate the invasion of the West by a hostile force.

GMWA 35 – Success, Making Do in the Home, The White Man’s Burden

Good Morning White America! In this episode Adam flies solo and talks about success. What do you need to do to succeed in life? What do you need to stop doing to stop being a self-inflicted casualty? Also, Hans and Anna Gygax talk about making do, and the Hate Bird reads “The White Man’s Burden.”

Bitcoin D’nations:



Thanks for listening! Please subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, and share it with everyone you know!

37:42 – Biblical Nationalist Principles in Every Decision, with Hans & Anna Gygax

58:23 – Real Poetry Hours, with the Hate Bird

Find podcasts, books, fellowship, and articles at!

Subscribe on iTunes at:…ast/id1124195733

Follow us on Twitter and @GMWhiteAmerica

Find us on Facebook at

Download new episodes at or on Soundcloud at

Read Adam Grey’s articles at

Link: Walls and Fences children’s book by Mary Grey & illustrated by Ford Henry – full-color, 24 pages, paperback

Link: Super Bowl Champion Tom Brady, Role Model of Success – by Adam Grey

Chip Gaines and the Futility of Compromise

The recent controversy surrounding reality TV stars Chip and Joanna Gaines has brought the persecution of Christians by homosexual activists to a new level. Chip Gaines never made any public statements denouncing sodomy, and there have been no leaked audio recordings or emails betraying Gaines’ private opinion on the issue. The controversy was whipped up by the left-wing media due to the simple fact that Chip Gaines and his wife attend an Evangelical church that defines marriage as being between one man and one woman.

The precedent being set here is frightening. A large number of conservatives belong to churches that do not accept homosexual “marriage”. This includes Catholics, members of the Southern Baptist Convention, non-denominational Evangelicals and many others. The homosexual activists in the media are trying make a new rule: all conservative Christians should be shamed, bullied and banned from public life.

In response to the controversy, Chip Gaines released a disappointing and weak blog post in which he tried to avoid addressing the issue head on. He starts out by talking about how he and his wife can disagree on numerous things, thus indicating that we cannot expect all humans to agree on moral questions. This of course is beside the point. The issue is not what fallen humans can agree on, the issue is what God has told us to do: to preach his Word and not to deny or remove any single point of it. The word “sin” does not appear once in the post, although Gaines is emphatic that,

We care about you for the simple fact that you are a person, our neighbor on planet earth. It’s not about what color your skin is, how much money you have in the bank, your political affiliation, sexual orientation, gender, nationality or faith. That’s all fascinating, but it cannot add or take away from the reality that we’re already pulling for you. We are not about to get in the nasty business of throwing stones at each other, don’t ask us to cause we won’t play that way…We want to help initiate conversations between people that don’t think alike. Listen to me, we do not all have to agree with each other. Disagreement is not the same thing as hate, don’t believe that lie.

It is hard to imagine a softer statement of disapproval of homosexuality.

The futility of the approach chosen by Gaines can be seen in an angry response written by homosexual Noah Michelson at the Huffington Post. Gaines’ response to the controversy is as feeble and non-confrontational as it could have been given that Gaines presumably agrees with the official beliefs of his church, but the militant homosexuals are still not satisfied. Michelson condemns Gaines’ call for us all to agree to disagree:

…a church or an individual or a government telling a queer person that they are a sinner or that they don’t deserve to get married or that queer people should be treated any less or any differently than non-queer people merely because of who they are is not “lovingly disagreeing.”

It’s the same tired nonsense that’s continually peddled by folks who aren’t cool with queer people but don’t want to be called a bigot or deal with the possibility of a boycott against their businesses. And as much as it hurts to hear, in this case, disagreement is hate…

The bottom line is: My humanity is not something you get to disagree with. You don’t get to tell me that I’m morally corrupt or sexually deviant or unworthy of the same rights that you enjoy and then look me in the face and tell me that you still love me. That’s nothing remotely close to resembling love.

By the same token, if by some chance you don’t agree with your church’s doctrine, you don’t get to attend a church that’s anti-LGBTQ and not be called out.

Tolerating homosexuality is no longer acceptable. It is now necessary to state publicly that homosexuality is not sinful. Any disagreement on this topic is “hate” that deserves to be “called out.” Any moral chastisement is seen as an assault on a deviant individual’s humanity. Soon it will be considered a human rights violation simply to quote what the Bible says about homosexuality.

The moral of the lesson is clear. There can be no compromise with evil. We should not try to build bridges to those who are seeking to persecute us by softening our position. When the Church retreats, it loses. When the Church compromises, it loses. Only by following the example of Christ and his apostles can we expect to defeat the wickedness of this world.

For more from Clement Pulaski, go to

Milo Yiannopoulos: A Jewish Fraud

Milo Yiannopoulos (hereafter Milo) is a somewhat famous e-celebrity and social media pundit. He is perhaps best known for his role in the GamerGate controversy. Milo is currently giving speeches at various university events in the United States; an activity that he has dubbed the ‘Dangerous Faggot’ tour.

He also happens to be jewish. (1)

Despite his self-portrayal as a ‘crusader’ for justice; Milo is a consummate showman and shock jock not a true believer in any ideology of the moment that he claims to espouse. (2) As part of his ongoing ‘Dangerous Faggot’ tour he has even sung the American national anthem dressed like a transvestite, which gives you some idea of Milo’s general modus operandi and intellectual vacuousness. (3)

One of the tools that Milo used to trigger (i.e. get a rise out of) the political left was to claim in January 2016 that he was going to set up a college fund exclusively to support White men. As he himself admits: this wasn’t because he believed in the necessity of combating rampant anti-White discrimination and bias at colleges, but simply to trigger the political left. (4)

However it quickly became apparent to Milo that such a scheme could actually attract a significant amount of funding. The plan for the ‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’ swiftly began to take shape after Milo managed to successfully solicit donations from ‘very famous rappers, novelists, politicians’ who are quietly ‘friends of his’. (5)

This is plausible I suppose, but it does make one wonder: just who are these people and given that their donations of presumably significant sums of money (something between $100,000 and $350,000 has been collected or pledged) (5) would necessarily make their support of Milo public.

Soon after the announcement of its creation Milo even ran a live-streamed fundraising event for the ‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’, which also contributed significantly to the aforementioned donation and pledge figure. (6) The first fifty bursaries of $2,500 each were to be distributed in early summer 2016 in time for students returning to, or preparing to attend, college.

Summer came and went, but yet there was no announcement that the applications process for the promised bursaries was open, no one knew where the money was and there was (and is still as I write this) no properly constituted charitable legal entity behind the‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’. (7)

The problem here is obvious: Milo has raised a lot of money for a specific charitable purpose and has signally failed to even arrange for basic administration to be done.

Naturally many of the e-celebrities and donors who took part in/contributed to this funding, such as transsexual vlogger Blaire White, are incredibly upset at this sorry state of affairs and have been demanding an explanation from Milo via their social media accounts. (8)

Being conscious that the extremely damaging controversy surrounding the non-activity and broken promises of the ‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’. Milo has taken to his own show to ‘explain’ the situation to his fans and donors. (9)

Predictably our boy is trying to explain away his personal and professional failings as being due to overwork and having a hectic e-celebrity schedule. This is, of course, nonsense because the only ‘overwork’ Milo is undertaking at present is scooting around the United States giving short presentations to groups of students plus performing his usual journalistic activities. If Milo was unable to do the requisite work to make this happen then it was up to him to make sure that someone else did.

In other words: he should have delegated.

Since, as the Advocate has pointed out, his failure to properly set up the ‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’ may well itself be a legal issue. Since Milo represented the ‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’ as charity before it had even applied with the IRS to be one, which is tantamount to fraud. (10)

Milo himself has implicitly recognised this fact when he admitted that he might have ‘wound up’ the ‘wrong people’ on this occasion. (11) The ‘wrong people’ are lawyers and his erstwhile supporters like Blaire White.

What Milo skips over in all of this is the inconvenient fact that Margaret MacLennan, the (former) administrator of the ‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’ and an e-celebrity in her own right, has revealed and provided evidence that all the money was wired to Milo’s personal account not one set up specifically for the ‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’. (12)

MacLennan also stated that her role was to ‘develop the application and reward process’, which is incredibly vague but also necessarily suggests that Milo is personally responsible for, and has direct control of, the financial affairs of the ‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’.

Milo has yet to release a financial statement or any evidence that the donated funds are still intact and separated from his own personal finances as per normal accounting and legal practice. That this is the situation is quite frankly alarming and suggests that in spite of Milo’s assurances: the donated money may well not be intact and separate from his own personal finances.

That this could well be the case is also suggested by the fact that Milo originally claimed that he would pay all administrative and operating expenses out of his own pocket (including MacLennan’s salary), but this never materialised. (13)

MacLennan has also disclosed that she was recently offered $500 by an intermediary for Milo for ‘services rendered’, which she refused on the grounds that she could not verify if this money offered was coming from Milo’s actual savings or the donations to the‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’ that are sitting in his personal bank account. (14)

The fact that it has taken six months for Milo to offer MacLennan any compensation – however paltry – for her work for the‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’ and then only after the media had begun closely scrutinising Milo’s financial affairs. All rather goes to suggest that this monetary offer isn’t so much compensation for services rendered, but rather a rather ham-fisted attempt to get MacLennan to accept hush money.

MacLennan is after all a major source of leaks in regards to the media about the ‘Yiannopoulous Privilege Grant’s’ financial affairs. So much so that Milo has turned nastily on MacLennan and labelled her as ‘incompetent’ in a recent exchange with journalists on this issue. (15)

Interestingly faced with his own lack of financial transparency Milo immediately claimed that he would disburse the funds in the spring of 2017.  However with the announcement that the ‘Yiannopoulous Privilege Grant’ is now accepting applications on 31st January 2017; (16) another curious inconsistency has come to light.

This is that the grants of $2,500 will only be to ten applicants (17) not the original fifty. (18) That is a disbursement of only $25,000, which is only a quarter of the minimum that amount Milo is believed to have received in donations ($100,000) while a merely fourteenth of the maximum amount he is quoted as having received ($350,000).

This seems odd precisely because if sufficient funds have already been collected – as we know they have – then there is no reason not to rectify the failure to meet the previous deadline of the 2016/2017 academic year by fully disbursing in the spring of 2017.

After all: if you have the money and have made a promise then you should keep to that.

Why would Milo not do this?

Obviously we don’t know precisely why, but the likeliest reason not to fully disburse the funds in the 2016/2017 academic year is if the donated funds – that remember were transferred to Milo’s personal bank account – are not intact and separate from Milo’s own personal funds (i.e. he has been using them to fund or pay for something unrelated to the ‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’).

Therefore Milo needs time in order to find a way to recover that money or acquire more funds in order to cover the funding gap. It is worth remembering that as far as any source on this aware: there is no evidence that Milo has declared how much money he got from the donations. All we know is that he claims to have got something in the region of £350,000 in donations and pledges.

Since this money is in Milo’s personal account and, as far as we know, not kept separately from his personal savings; it therefore follows that Milo has had both access and the ability to use the money in whatever way he sees fit as there is no direct financial oversight of his dealings as it stands.

The simple fact is that we don’t know what Milo has done with the money other than that:

A) The capital is, as far as we know, in his personal account.

B) He has had the capital in his personal account for around a year (February/March 2016 to February 2017) and thus has financially benefited from having this capital in his account (in terms of interest etc).

C) There is no financial transparency about where the capital is or how much is there.

D) He is only apparently planning to disburse a quarter to a fourteenth of the total amount raised.

Now call me suspicious but that doesn’t sound like an honest mistake and it certainly isn’t anything remotely like good practice. In fact it rather sounds like Milo is attempting to buy time so he can do and/or rectify something.

What else is there to rectify in this situation but a financial irregularity?

There isn’t; well at least nothing that anyone not privy to the inner workings of Milo’s mind is aware of anyway.

Now add to this that it just so happens that Milo has appointed Colin Madine, one of his own subordinates at Breitbart News, (19) to lead the ‘administration’ of the ‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’ scheme. (20)

That this is a direct conflict of interest is obvious and an especially reprehensible one in an ostensibly charitable organisation, but it is a useful situation if you are trying to cover something up.

Since Madine is obviously beholden to Milo, because the latter can exact retribution against Madine’s career and employment status at Breitbart if Madine squeals to outsiders about the controversial financial affairs as MacLennan had previously done. Creating this conflict of interest and thus enabling a form of blackmail allows Milo to control the flow of information a lot better than just employing skilled people who aren’t completely beholden to him for their livelihoods and future career prospects.

Further Milo has previous form for financial and legal misconduct. For example: he failed to register his company Sentinel Media under the Data Protection Act in 2011 in Britain. (21)

Indeed he used precisely the same excuse regarding this infringement of the law (i.e. my lawyers are sorting it out) as he has with his failure to create a properly constituted legal charity to form the financial basis of the ‘Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant’.

Milo was convicted by a British court for his part in the Sentinel Media debacle.

What are the chances that this con-man and self-styled prankster is trying the same trick again?

After all: it is only other people’s money… right?

As with MacLennan; Milo also failed to pay Jason Hesse’s – editor of the magazine ‘The Kernal’ owned by Milo’s Sentinel Media – contractually-agreed wages. (22)

Milo also failed to pay agreed royalties to contributors and photographers for the use of their work in this same magazine. (23)

Indeed Milo’s conduct towards his employees and contributors at ‘The Kernal’ was nothing short of atrocious.

To quote the Guardian:

‘Hesse told MediaGuardian: “Milo never paid me a penny for the work I did as editor, nor for the three months of hosting bills I paid for The Kernel, nor for the money I lent to him personally. Why he thinks he can just get away with it is beyond me. I hope that the high court’s order will help him finally understand that it isn’t his choice to decide whether or not he wants to pay me; it’s the law.”

Two other former writers, Margot Huysman and Mic Wright, say they are still waiting for a balance of about £4,000 each to be paid. Yiannopoulos paid each of them about £1,000 at the end of October and, they say, promised further payments each month – but those were not forthcoming. When Huysman complained of the non-payment on Twitter, he sent her emails saying “You’ve already made yourself permanently unemployable in London with your hysterical, brainless tweeting, by behaving like a common prostitute and after starting a war with me, as perhaps you are now discovering” and implying he had a salacious picture of her from a party that he would publish if she persisted in complaining.’ (24)

Clearly this sort of behaviour is not acceptable, but it does strongly suggest that Milo is an extremely bitter and twisted individual with severe psychological issues under all that superficial glibness.

It also indicates that Madine isn’t likely to wish to cross his boss and explains why Milo failed to honour the financial promises he made to MacLennan only to then offer her hush money and call her ‘incompetent’ when the media began scrutinising his dubious financial affairs.

This is the real Milo Yiannopoulos: a deceitful, bitter and twisted jewish man who fails to honour his promises, fails to pay and then tries to blackmail his employees. In addition to hiding some $100,000 to £350,000 of other people’s charitable donations in his own personal bank account, which he suddenly has no wish to disburse quite as quickly as when it wasn’t falsely inflating his own financial position.

The question you have to ask yourself about Milo is simply this: is everybody else who has worked with and been burned by him wrong or is the real Milo the tantrum-prone egotistical monster that they describe?

You decide.

For more from Dr. Karl Radl, go to



(6) Cf.
(12) Ibid;
(14) Ibid.
(15) This is the necessary implication of his comments quoted in:
(17) Ibid.
(22) Ibid.
(23) Ibid.
(24) Ibid.