books

The Alt-Right, Jane Austen, and Whiteness

A recent article in the New York Times discusses the apparently puzzling topic of Jane Austen fans on the Alt-Right. I say apparently puzzling because the white liberal fans of Jane Austen cannot get past the Hollywood image of “white supremacists”. They have been taught their entire lives that white supremacists smoke meth and live in trailer parks, and that the only white people who really care about Western civilization are the good liberals like themselves who are working hard to destroy the West’s racial foundation.

The Austen expert cited in the piece seems to think that Alt-Right Austen fans are using the author’s works as part of a devious plot to make white nationalism seem more wholesome:

“By comparing their movement not to the nightmare Germany of Hitler and Goebbels, but instead to the cozy England of Austen,” she writes, alt-right Austen fans “nudge readers” into thinking that “perhaps white supremacists aren’t so different from mainstream folks.”

Another lady quoted in the piece seems to think that genuine admiration of Austen by “racists” is totally implausible:

“No one who reads Jane Austen’s words with any attention and reflection can possibly be alt-right,” Elaine Bander, a retired professor and a former officer of the Jane Austen Society of North America, said in an email.

“All the Janeites I know,” she added, “are rational, compassionate, liberal-minded people.”

What these white liberals fail to realize, of course, is that the works of Jane Austen are a product of white civilization. It is impossible to conceive of the world of Austen without whiteness. The English ladies and gentlemen, their country estates and their charming manners are bursting with whiteness. The appreciation of Austen’s books is equally entwined with whiteness, although the whiteness is implicit.

Whiteness follows white people wherever they go not matter how hard they try to avoid it. Even the white anti-racist’s anguish over his own whiteness is a product of that very whiteness (no other races ever reflect on themselves in that way).  Whether it’s Jane Austen novels or the music of Depeche Mode, white nationalists rally around distinctively white things because we value whiteness and are alarmed that it is being threatened. We embrace many of the same things that white liberals do, but we do so fully conscious of our whiteness.

My own move towards white nationalism was largely a result of coming to realize that without racial nationalism all of the things that I valued about white civilization would disappear. Like the Janeites mentioned by Elaine Bander, I was raised as a “rational, compassionate, liberal-minded” individual. While growing up in San Francisco I enjoyed going to the symphony, reading poetry by Wordsworth and Shelley, and studying the Greco-Roman Classics. Hardly the makings of a mouth-breathing Hollywood Nazi. But truly caring about the great achievements of European culture must imply racial nationalism.  No honest assessment of the current cultural and demographic situation can conclude that Western (i.e., white) civilization can continue without the white race.

By embracing the world of Jane Austen white nationalists are not being dishonest. It is the white liberals who are being dishonest when they claim that geniune appreciation of Jane Austen is compatible with our degenerate contemporary society. The choice facing the West is clear. On one side we have the world of Jane Austen, on the other side we have the world of slut walks, transgender “rights”, and immigrant invasion. We can only chose one side.

Assault on the Fairy Tale

The world of fairy tales is one of the great treasures of our European heritage. This world was born of our ancient folk customs and the shining light of Christianity. It is full of beauty, poetry and moral clarity. Evil is thoroughly evil, and the good is noble and heroic. In these tales the Christian virtues triumph and quests are won by characters full of selfless bravery. The petty, mundane concerns of modern life are left behind and our imaginative faculty fully embraces a different world. By speaking to our imagination in addition to our intellect the fairy tale is more than just moral contemplation, it is a deep experience that can influence the entire human personality. This fantastic world is the nursery of culture, for it is in fairy tales that many white children first encounter artistic idealism, a way of looking at the world that has propelled the West to its greatest heights.

The natural appeal of fairy tales to both young and old has lasted through the centuries. Artists such as Edmund Spenser, George MacDonald, C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkein have explored this world, adding new details and ideas while remaining faithful to the old spirit. In the realm of popular culture, the Disney animated films provided a pop-culture version that nevertheless stayed quite close to the original material. Until recently, that is. Now that Jews and other godless individuals have gained complete control over the entertainment media, it is no surprise that our beloved fairy tales are being corrupted. Films like Shrek and Frozen cheapened and denigrated the original spirit of the fairy tale, but these films were only the beginning. The Telegraph reports that the upcoming live action Beauty and the Beast remake will even feature a positive portrayal of homosexuality:

It built its reputation on princesses finding their prince, living happily ever after in storylines which set the benchmark for romance for generations of children.

Now, Disney is to move firmly into a new era as it introduces its first “exclusively gay moment”, disclosing the new version of Beauty and the Beast will star a manservant exploring his sexuality.

The live-action version of Beauty and the Beast is already on course to be the most thoroughly modern film of its kind, with star Emma Watson discussing how she made the role of Belle more feminist.

The team have now revealed one character, LeFou, will experience Disney’s first ever “gay moment” on screen, as he struggles with his feelings for ultra-macho leading man Gaston.

In an interview with Attitude magazine, director Bill Condon said: “LeFou is somebody who on one day wants to be Gaston and on another day wants to kiss Gaston. “He’s confused about what he wants. It’s somebody who’s just realizing that he has these feelings. “And Josh [Gad, who plays LeFou] makes something really subtle and delicious out of it.

It is bad enough that Jewish Hollywood promotes homosexuality in film and television, now they are promoting it in fairy tales aimed at children. The fairy world of valor and purity is being assaulted. For many whites, there are no safe spaces left in which to raise our families. Under the reign of perverted Jewish Hollywood, there are no more safe spaces for the imagination of white children. The fairy tale, which should be a place of moral instruction and wonder, has become just another weapon in the hands of our enemies.

Crypto-Jew Who Subverted the Catholic Church Turns Out to Be a Crypto-Homosexual

Gregory Baum was one of the many Jewish “converts” to Catholicism who suceeded in reversing the ancient position of the Roman Church regarding the Jews. I refer to Jews like Baum as “crypto-Jews” because they only accepted the teaching of the Catholic Church outwardly while inwardly retaining their Jewish identity. Once accepted as Catholic, these fake converts immediately sought to undermine the teachings of faith they claimed to embrace. This is a clear indication of a false conversion. In the Christian sense conversion is a complete change from one’s old way of living and thinking. It is a new birth in Jesus Christ and it marks the beginning of a life of obedience to a new set of principles. If Jews like Baum had actually converted they would have sought to follow diligently the established principles of the religion they outwardly confessed, rather than trying to tear them down.

In an article from the Jewish Daily Forward, we read about the Jewish role in making the Catholic Church more pro-Jewish:

At one critical moment in October 1964, priests Gregory Baum and Bruno Hussar joined Oesterreicher in assembling what became the final text of the council’s decree on the Jews, voted on by the bishops a year later. Like Oesterreicher, Baum and Hussar were converts of Jewish background.

They were continuing a trend going back to the First Vatican Council in 1870, when the brothers Lémann — Jews who had become Catholics and priests — presented a draft declaration on relations between the church and Jews, stating that Jews “are always very dear to God” because of their fathers and because Christ has issued from them “according to the flesh.” Without converts to Catholicism, it seems, the Catholic Church would never have “thought its way” out of the challenges of racist anti-Judaism.

What this Jewish publication is admitting is that without false conversion and infiltration the Catholic Church would have remained faithful to their traditions. The same is true of Western society at large: without Jews “helping” us along the road to secularism, multiculturalism and hedonism, we would be in a much better situation.

A recent article from Life Site News has now revealed that in addition to being a crypto-Jew, Baum was also a secret homosexual:

93-year-old Gregory Baum, a famed Canadian Catholic ex-priest, has in his latest book revealed that he secretly led an active homosexual life for decades.

Baum, who was a peritus or expert at the Second Vatican Council, reportedly composed the first draft of the conciliar document Nostra aetate, the Declaration on the Relation of the Church with Non-Christian Religions. Baum advocated for the elimination of the Church’s efforts to encourage Jews to recognize Christ as the Messiah and has since pushed social justice and liberation theology.

The influential cleric reveals candidly in The Oil Has Not Run Dry: The Story of My Theological Pathway, “I did not profess my own homosexuality in public because such an act of honesty would have reduced my influence as a critical theologian.” “I was eager to be heard as a theologian trusting in God as salvator mundi and committed to social justice, liberation theology, and global solidarity.”

Baum flatly admits that he concealed his sexual perversion in order to maintain credibility while pushing for “social justice” and globalism.

The case of Baum shows us how deadly compromise with the enemy can be. Whenever people try to “cure” the Church of homophobia, racism or antisemitism, we can be sure that that their goal is to replace Biblical teaching with thinly disguised Marxism. We should not allow non-Christian voices to tell us what the Church should be, and we should not accept converts who do not completely forsake the worldly ideologies that are seeking to destroy Christ’s kingdom.

Peace in the Lord

The Trump victory brought many of us a very new and strange experience: political victory. After so many decades of political defeat, traditionalists and nationalists had become used to being completely powerless in the face of the Jewish, globalist behemoth. Lacking outer strength, we were forced to turn inwards. While the lack of political power was certainly lamentable, there were benefits to this inward focus, especially for Christians. When we were without any help from men we had no choice but to turn to God. The constant assault of atheism, multiculturalism, feminism and militant homosexuality would bring any right-thinking man to total despair if he could not stay focused on the once and for all victory of Christ over the Devil and all of his servants. The servants of Satan might have been able to claim temporary victories for the advancement of communistic egalitarianism or the latest degenerate lifestyle, but we knew that they were living on borrowed time. The end of days will eventually come and the victory of Christ that we know by faith will be revealed to all men.

“Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” (Philippians 2:9-11)

However, now that the Trump presidency has sparked the beginning of white identity politics, our confident resignation has been replaced by something new. This something new certainly has elements of joy and relief, but, at least in my case, it also has elements of anxiety and excessive entanglement with the world. Before the Trump phenomenon my daily reading of the news brought dismay, but a calm, resigned dismay. Now as I follow the news I frequently find myself in great suspense wondering whether or not Trump will succeed. Each day I worry about what tomorrow will bring, in clear contradiction to the teaching of our Lord:

“Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.” (Matthew 6:34)

Here Jesus is not warning us against making prudent plans for the future, but against becoming so focused on the events of the world that we lose sight of God.

Following the news over the last few weeks has shown us how little power we truly have over what is happening in our country. It appears that there is a struggle going on between Trump and certain elements within our intelligence agencies. The struggle is so obscure that we cannot predict the outcome, let alone influence it. Any day now agents in the CIA might release damaging information about Trump—real or fabricated—that could lead to the end of his administration. In situations like this where we cannot control the outcome it does not benefit us at all to become consumed with anxiety. We certainly have a duty to engage in political activity and to fight for a brighter future for our people, but we cannot let this fight cause us to lose the inner peace that God has offered to us.

“Woe to them that go down to Egypt for help; and stay on horses, and trust in chariots, because they are many; and in horsemen, because they are very strong; but they look not unto the Holy One of Israel, neither seek the Lord!…Now the Egyptians are men, and not God; and their horses flesh, and not spirit. When the Lord shall stretch out his hand, both he that helpeth shall fall, and he that is holpen shall fall down, and they all shall fail together.” (Isaiah 31:1,3)

All earthly strength eventually fails. As much as we should be grateful to Trump for routing our enemies, we must not forget that ultimately his strength is earthly. Stay vigilant, and stay active in pushing the nationalist agenda in whatever way you can, but only look for peace in the one power that can never fail.

If There Really Were a Refugee Crisis

The ongoing invasion of the West by Third World migrants is constantly being referred to as part of a “refugee crisis”. We are told that the only proper response to this crisis is to allow all migrants to settle in the West and immediately grant them full citizenship rights. Many churches have blindly accepted this narrative and are complicit in the deliberate destruction of the lands once known collectively as Christendom.

The first point to grasp is that there is no “refugee crisis.” Citing the current Syrian civil war as the cause of the “refugee crisis” is only a pretext. The anti-white elites who wish to transform the demographics of Europe actively enticed the Muslim and African hordes by promising them easy living in white countries. This is what has caused the refugee flood, not any actual catastrophe. The migrants come from all over Africa and the Middle East, not just Syria, and even the mainstream media frequently mentions that these “refugees” are fleeing from “war and poverty” in their home countries. There have always been countries in Africa and the Middle East that are poor compared to the West, and there have been wars and other conflicts in these countries for decades. If being in a country that is poorer or more violent than Western Europe grants the automatic right of immigration, then the entire third world would possess this right. When carried to its logical conclusion this attitude towards immigration can only result in the destruction of all national borders and the very concept of national sovereignty. There is nothing new in the number of non-whites who want to immigrate to the West. The “crisis” is purely the result of the fictional narrative promoted by the lying media and treasonous Western governments.

But even if there really were a refugee crisis, it does not follow that every legitimate refugee should be granted citizenship status and given a full stake in his host country. To support their pro-invasion position Evangelicals frequently site Bible verses like Leviticus 19:33, “But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.” But this verse and others like it simply cannot mean what the pro-invasion interpreters want it to mean. If the ancient Israelites had understood Leviticus 19:33 in the way that modern Christians do, the ancient nation of Israel would have disappeared within a couple generations. The ancient Israelites would have invited every neighboring worshiper of Molech or Beelzebub to live in their country, vote in their assemblies, and be granted landed property, all without making any demands that the newcomers adopt the native religion or culture of Israel. This is not what God commanded His people to do. The Israelites were to chose their political rulers from their own kinsmen, and they were to carefully preserve the tribal allotment of land ownership. The Old Testament is quite clear that Israel was to remain a religiously, culturally and ethnically distinct nation. It is impossible that God’s law could include any commandments that would lead to the destruction of the nation Israel, or to the nation-state in general. Leviticus 19:33 simply means that strangers must be treated equally before the law. God told His people that it was unlawful to abuse or defraud non-citizens, but He did not tell them that the distinction between citizen and non-citizen must be completely abolished. Contemporary pro-invasion Christians have adopted the globalist position that the very concepts of national sovereignty and distinct citizenship are sinful. This is a perversion of Biblical teaching and it will bring about the destruction of our independent nations.

If there really were innocent people who needed shelter in our lands, this could be done on a temporary basis and without allowing potentially dangerous refugees to move freely throughout our society. We could make it clear that refugees that are racially or ideologically incompatible with our nation will not be allowed to become citizens. We could invite them into our own countries and provide safe, segregated accommodations until the situation in their homelands improved. If the refugees found such accommodations insulting and decided to return home rather than put up with such “racism”, then clearly their lives were not in danger in the first place.

When the lying media talks about the “refugee crisis” their primary goal is not saving the lives of those threatened by war. Their goal is to facilitate the invasion of the West by a hostile force.